Talk:3rd (Volunteer) Battalion, Cheshire Regiment

3rd (Volunteer) Battalion, Cheshire Regiment has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Military history: British / European / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:3rd (Volunteer) Battalion, Cheshire Regiment/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"in Cheshire and" which is in which country?
"the late part of the" latter?
"Territorial Army" surely a link for this.
"the remaining 'Volunteer Regiments'," remaining from what/when?
"new TA battalions" expand to Territorial Army here, link, and then add (TA) after.
Are these sub-divisions of the British Army? I don't see that mentioned. Probably needs to go in the lead as well, for context.
"As part of the battalion's NATO" link NATO and this sentence is unreferenced.
"platoon in Macclesfield, while Gaza" Macclesfield is overlinked.
" its mortar platoon" link mortar appropriately.
"in Stockport (formed " overlinked, as are all locations following in those bullet points.
"Platoon in Stockport. At the same time, Gaza Company was redesignated as D (Cheshire) Company based in Crewe, with its GPMG (SF) Platoon in Northwich.[" all locations overlinked.
"the King's and Cheshire Regiment was broken" overlinked.
"Warrington and Stockport,[8] and" both overlinked.
Crewe, Cheshire, Stoke-on-Trent, Ellesmere Port, Stockport, Cheshire (again), Peninsula Barracks, and Warrington all overlinked.
Ref titles, spaced hyphens should be spaced en-dashes.
Year rang in ref 6 title should be unspaced en-dash.
Retrieval dates should be in the same format, i.e. all YYYY-MM-DD or DD MMM YYYY.
Isn't british-army-units1945on.co.uk. just British Army as a publisher?
"1660-1978" en-dash.

That's all I have on a first read. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Please tag me if you need anymore changes :). J-Man11 (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ungrammatical sentence (section Formation)

In this Good Article this sentence reads without making sense to me - I suspect a misspelt word somewhere - could someone clarify this?

The former regiments were split, with their companies distributing form new TA battalions being formed in the regular infantry regiments. Cloptonson (talk) 17:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]