Jump to content

Talk:32X/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 09:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to take up the task of reviewing this article for GA status. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 09:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic. I look forward to hearing the results. Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 00:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Decent article overall.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    A lot of information presented here, but not too much.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    As negative as this console seemed to be, both sides have been presented fairly in my opinion.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This is a very good article overall.

Thanks. Yeah, the console was pretty poorly perceived and still is. Getting a neutral point was pretty tough because there's very few who see this console add-on in a positive light. I tend to think it's what really killed Sega as a console maker, even though they made the Saturn and Dreamcast later on. Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 00:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This interview offers a tiny bit of positive, perhaps. I'm not sure if it's just trivial information or not.--SexyKick 04:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Even with all the negative attention, you've done brilliantly.
 pass! Sorry, I would have done this last night (about 14 hours ago), but the Internet cut out randomly. Well done! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 01:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]