Talk:321 EOD & Search Squadron RLC

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Merge?

Please discuss here as opposed to simply removing the merge tag Weggie 17:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit dont revert 86.143.107.249 17:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited by changing the merge location i.e. to the parent regiment Weggie 18:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

321 Too important to merge

321 is still one of the most highly decorated units in the British Army, and until recently was a separate entity to 11 EOD. No need to merge. 86.143.107.249 06:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So could you update the article - are there any sources or references you can provide to state the individual notability of this unit? Weggie 09:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

321 EOD Sqn RLC is an independant unit born out of 321 EOD Coy RAOC, which was a shadow unit of AIDU (Ammunition Inspection and Disposal Unit) RAOC which deployed to the province in 1969 to assist the existing AIDU in dealing with the increasing amount of IEDs being used by both Loyallist and Republican factions as the Troubles escalated. The Unit still maintains an ammunition Inspectorate function with personnel posted there for normal 2-3 year tours and IED response teams posted to the Unit for 4-6 month Emergency tours. In August 2007 the Unit will become part of 11 EOD Regt RLC (Who conduct ALL of the Armys' Improvised Explosive Device Disposal - IEDD - in mainland GB and BFG). 321 has a long and illustrious history that deserves to be kept separate. ExAT82.109.66.144 13:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK - fair enough I've removed the merge tag - it would be worth updating the article with the info above to make the unit's notability clear Weggie 13:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 321 EOD Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]