Talk:2C-G

This article was nominated for deletion on March 11 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Comments

I completely revamped the page, and added quite a bit of info, mostly from PiHKAL. I also de-stubbed the page because I feel that this is all the information there is on 2C-G (+ homologues). If more comes along it should of course be added, but I doubt any more information will surface. After all, Shulgin's lab is shut down, his group is likely disbanded and this drug will probably never be used on the street due to its extremely long duration :). --Silvem 09:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of the 2D pictures are wrong

All of the 2D structures do not agree with the 3D structures given in the same article, and this appears to be the case in each of the 2C family individual pages. It appears that the 3,6 analouges are shown, not 2,5. ERP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.149.241.170 (talk) 22:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. For one, that's how Shulgin drew it in his books. You are probably unfamiliar with the notation of aryl rings such as this; it is acceptable to have the positions flipped as you describe. Due to single-bond rotation they are the same compound, just displayed differently. flaming () 02:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]