Jump to content

Talk:26th Battalion (Australia)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 04:13, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Progression

[edit]
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

[edit]

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • "it formed part of the 7th Brigade, which was attached to 2nd Division..." missing definite article here: i.e. "the 2nd Division".
    • Repetitive prose here: "in late August they advanced on the brigade's left during an attack at Biaches which saw the Allies advance..." (advanced and advance), perhaps reword slightly?
    • "Following the outbreak of World War II in September 1939"... World War II is wikilinked here, but you use it in the paragraph above without wikilinking)
    • I think the comma might be out of place here: "Determined Japanese resistance along the Ratsua front, resulted in an amphibious landing..."
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Article is well referenced with all major points cited to WP:RS.
    • No issues with OR that I could see.
    • Good use of recently published material.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
    • No issues I could see.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • No issues here.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
    • Images seem to be free / PD and most have the req'd information / templates.
    • Captions look fine.