Talk:24 Heures

Untitled

If both Canadian papers are discussed on the same Wikipedia article, then why split out the information like this on the dab page? Does this help people find the article better? I don't think so. If so, please explain. Tedernst | talk 23:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As there are two editions for different cities, I think one should be able to read that on this page in one way or the other. BTW another paper to add: 24 heures -- User:Docu

Go ahead and add the other one. As for our issue here, disambiguation pages are not for information. They are to help the reader find the correct article as quickly as possible. All relevant information should be on the target pages, not on the dab page. So my question remains, does spliting them out into two seperate papers help the reader find the relevant article quicker? Tedernst | talk 23:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I prefer my initial version or the second version. Which one do you prefer? BTW Please help expanding the page as well. I'm sure there are some other titles that could be added. -- User:Docu

Speedy Delete

The 24 hours page covers this topic. Since 24 heures is not english it shouldn't be a seperate article on en.wikipedia.org-- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 11:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

24 heures already has an article in English wikipedia, but 24 heures still needs one. -- User:Docu

Restoring my speedy. the page you linked to needing a new page is non-english. This is the english wikipedia. The sites you mention would possibly warrant a page on fr.wikipedia.com but not en.wikipedia.com as an english person could not receive any benefit by visiting them. Reviewing the other pages listed here for possible deletion as well. Thanks for making them easy to find :) -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 01:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a paper, not a website. I understand that you are not interested, but possibly (b|B)ritish persons are interested. -- User:Docu