Talk:21 grams experiment/GA1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bluesphere (talk · contribs) 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to review this article in a day or two. Bluesphere 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Alright, I have thoroughly gone through the article and I must say that I find no issues that prevents it from becoming a Good Article—the prose is well-written, engaging, and places all facts in context; images are properly licensed; sources appear to be reliable and supported inline; and it's broad for the most part, covering most topics associated with the subject. When I ran the Earwig tool it detected about 40% copyvio, but I ran it again today and became 29.6% which is kind of odd. But examining carefully, there is not a single copyright violation throughout. As a whole you did a wonderful job improving an article about a controversial yet divisive subject. So I'm happy to say this article has passed, well done!
To conclude this review, I would recommend this article be featured on the main page via Wikipedia:Did You Know, as certain facts here are solid and might boost its page views.
- Thanks for your review Bluesphere. I've listed this at DYK as recommended. Also the copyvio percentage dropeed as I noticed it was too high after you started the review then trimmed it down a little bit. :) Ping me when your nomination is ready to be reviewed. Freikorp (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)