Talk:2024 Vermont Democratic presidential primary

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2024 Vermont Democratic presidential primary article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Vermont

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont.

Write-in votes in results table

I've just re-added in some write-in votes to the results table, after they were removed by Esolo5002 for not being included in the SoS' original report. My threshold, which I admit is rather arbitrary, was a candidate recieving write-in votes of 100 or more. While it may not be notable that, for example, Taylor Swift recieved four write-in votes, I think the write-in performance of, say, Rashida Tlaib, who recieved over 1% of the vote, more than multiple candidates on the ballot, is worth including in the table. I'm not quite sure where the line lies for inclusion, but I think somewhere above 100 votes or 0.1% of the vote seems about right, capturing particularly strong (relatively speaking) write-in performances while avoiding being overly specific and distracting for readers of the article. Alternatively, a drop-down table, as in 2003 California gubernatorial recall election#Results could be used -- what are your thoughts? LivelyRatification (talk) 05:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]