Talk:2024 Saurya Airlines Bombardier CRJ200 crash

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2024 Saurya Airlines Bombardier CRJ200 crash article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Is there an appropriate flight number that this incident could be named after for consistency with other commercial aircraft? Borgenland (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely. It was a ferry flight for maintenance, those, to my knowledge, don't usually get assigned flight numbers like commercial flights do, with the aircraft's registration (in this case 9N-AME) used as their callsign in radio communication. Flock of geese (talk) 15:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then we can do something like "2024 Saurya Airlines crash" (they are unlikely to have anohter this year given the context) but I don't see any reason that the aircraft type should be in the name. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but who expected in 2014 for Malaysia Airlines to have 2 plane crashes in just four months? But i also doubt Saurya Airlines would have another crash, i don't expect them to get grounded and cease operations for a while. Iyusi766 (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the flight number is flight FER per this source: [1] GalacticOrbits (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"took off in wrong direction"

I would kindly suggest that "he aircraft took off in the wrong direction" fragment in the Investigation section is changed to something alonge the lines "turned in the wrong direction after take off" or ""turned in the wrong direction after becoming airborne". The original phrasing suggest the aircraft lining up in the wrong direction on the runway and then taking off (here it would have been runway 20 instead of runway 02 that was in use) rather than veering to the right instead of turning left once airborne. As such, it is misleading and does not convey the information contained in the cited source. Flock of geese (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]