Talk:2023 Washington Bridge closure

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect.

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	Rhode Island portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island.

Bridges and Tunnels

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles

Requested move 17 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moot, article turned into redirect at AFD, see above notice. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Washington Bridge closure → Interstate 195 bridge closure – I195 is a more recognizable road. Jax 0677 (talk) 15:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose According to our article about I-195, there are multiple bridges along its route, as it crosses multiple bodies of water. Naming this Interstate 195 bridge closure begs the question in the title of which bridge was closed, and when was it closed. I don't see any good reason to deviate from WP:NCEVENT and the standard when, where, what naming convention for events and incidents. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it's specifically a defect of the bridge, a specific point on the interstate. - Kzirkel (talk)
Oppose the bridge itself is named Washington Bridge, not "Interstate 195 bridge". Plus as above, there are mulitple I-195 bridges, so would be less WP:PRECISE. Dank Jae 03:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Notability

Is this topic even notable? A bridge closure because of maintenance issues seems rather routine to me. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hell, I would argue against this article, and I'm one of the people with the most inclusive views about roads here. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 19:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree I contributed a photo to the article, but I agree, it's a nothingburger in the larger scheme of things. It's not a catastrophic event, it's just a closing for a few months. It's more appropriate as a (brief) section on the Washington Bridge article. - Kzirkel (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the notability tag since there's an ongoing deletion discussion. IMO, no need for both banners. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]