Jump to content

Talk:2023 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2023 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cessaune (talk · contribs) 15:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to review this. It'll probably take around a week. Cessaune [talk] 15:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All right. PCN02WPS, here we go...
For an easy comparison, I went directly to the 2022 championship game article (which is already a GA due to your work, good job!) and examined that one. It is exactly similar to this one; all the points made in that GA review apply here, generally speaking.
Sourcing is good and reliable; had an issue with one source (I can't view it) but I'm just going to assume good faith due to the quality of all the other sources. No edit wars, every section is adequately cited, addresses the salient points of the game (addresses all the points of the game down to each and every shot, which might be trending towards going into unnecessary detail, but I think we're fine), is well-written, verifiable, neutrally worded and stable.
It has no images. Images aren't strictly necessary for something like this, but, in a case where there are hundreds of relevant images available online, one or two would be good. However, I don't think it matters all too much.
Based on all this, I think this passes the GA criteria. Good job!
Are you going to submit a DYK nom? If you do, please let me know. I find the Jordan Hawkins/Angel Reese both winning thing to be interesting enough for one. Something like ... that Jordan Hawkins won the 2023 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game a day after his cousin Angel Reese won the women's championship? Naturally, I want to give the nominator the first chance to do so, but I'll do one in two days if it hasn't been done already. Cessaune [talk] 04:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cessaune Thank you! Feel free to go ahead with a DYK nom if you'd like. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 14:10, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk22:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by PCN02WPS (talk). Nominated by Cessaune (talk) at 14:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/2023 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Appears to meet all the criteria. No QPQ needed. Looks good to go! BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]