Talk:2022 United States Senate election in Arizona

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Arizona / State Legislatures / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Politics: American

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Endorsement

It is a very newsworthy that a prominent Neo-Nazi who runs the internet's most famous Neo-Nazi website endorsed a candidate (Blake Masters).

The endorsement happened and checks off all the boxes required for inclusion under wikipedia guidelines: 1) Anglin is notable. He has his own wikipedia page. The endorsement was covered by reliable sources. I cited them.

I even added a parenthetical that the endorsement was rejected and cited that.

Removal is unreasonable and makes the article less accurate/informative. 99.41.231.18 (talk) 19:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @99.41.231.18; of course Anglin's endorsement should be included. It looks as if @ErieSwiftByrd has struck the endorsement, however, stating "this notes that its rejected". I'm fine with that, if that's the MOS and current standard WP practice for election articles. Do you mind pointing to that policy, ErieSwiftByrd? I cannot find anything about striking endorsements to show they have been rejected on WP:ENDORSE. To me, the strikethrough implies the endorsement no longer exists, which is not the case. The endorsement was made and still stands; the italicized text after the endorsement already points out the endorsement was rejected by the subject. Any thoughts appreciated! --Kbabej (talk) 18:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that @FeesasTime0 is the one who added the strikethrough to the endorsement. I am not aware of a policy on this issue. I agree that the endorsement is notable enough that it should be included in the article. I would be fine with leaving the strikethrough in, providing extra signaling that he rejected he endorsement, thus it doesn't really still stand. But I don't have a string opinion on this issue. ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 01:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m confused. You added the strikethrough back, then commented here you’re fine leaving it in. That seems redundant and obvious, unless you meant to say you’re fine leaving it out.

Endorsement lists are for who has endorsed the candidate, not for lists of which endorsements the candidate has accepted. The strike through is misleading. —Kbabej (talk) 02:28, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are confused. I did not made any edits to the Anglin endorsement. That was another user. Go check the page history. ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, you are correct. I still think the strikethrough is misleading, however. --Kbabej (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Different polls there are

There are more different polls that can be used here to make it more accurate. What polls are there allowed on here because I saw some that might give more info on how the election is going and some from cnn too that show more and better surveys. There are also more predictions from news that could also be used as well here that could give more info. Bketrail (talk) 14:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CBS/Yougov shows a competitive race

Kelly still up but by only three points.

Mark Kelly has edge in Arizona Senate race that hinges on abortion, economy, immigration — CBS News Battleground Tracker - CBS News 93.206.55.170 (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

There were photos of other candidates here that are no longer here. The photos of other candidates can let people see who to vote for. There might be a good reasoning to not include photos of candidates but I didn't see where the reasoning is. Also the predictions are not updated at all and in previous senate elections in arizona the wiki showed more information in the introductions like here [1], which was the senate election that happened a while ago. 47sweeping055 (talk) 09:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

County Map is distorted, stretched vertically

Could someone please fix this? 67.60.186.104 (talk) 06:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now, thanks for the heads up. Scoutguy138 (talk) 06:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is still a little bit distorted for me. X7743729 (talk) 03:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@X7743729 If you're using Chrome, trying clearing your "Cached images and files" under "Privacy and security" > "Clear browsing data" (further help). Scoutguy138 (talk) 03:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]