Talk:2022 United States House of Representatives election in Wyoming

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

United States: Wyoming Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming (assessed as Low-importance).

Democrats

Are there any democrats running? Not that it really matters in this election just wondering. 2600:8807:6400:C1F0:31DD:91F9:F5BD:B345 (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Hageman has no wikipedia page

She is the GOP primary front runner with a gap of over 20 points and she is not considered relevant enough? 46.132.57.212 (talk) 08:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriet Hageman —twotwofourtysix^{(talk || edits)} 09:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, this is the same with other candidates that held no previous political office. GamingJam (talk) 23:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 15 August 2022. Remove Dan Crenshaw from Liz Cheney endorsement

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

NBS13QRS (talk) 09:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. —twotwofourtysix^{(talk || edits)} 10:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse edit request. When caught up in a content dispute, the most recent stable version should be used, until consensus is achieved to do otherwise. The most recent stable version did not include Dan Crenshaw, and thus, Crenshaw should be removed. See WikiBlame stats. Crenshaw was added only yesterday, for what is claimed to be an endorsement from the year 2021. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 10:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See this. The page was fully protected to stop the edit-warring, that's all. Protected pages may not be edited except to make changes that are uncontroversial or for which there is clear consensus. The back and forth about Crenshaw is what led to the full protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This reference does not prove endorsement of Cheney by Crenshaw. Just a tweet saying that "we can disagree without tearing each other apart" does not equate to an endorsement. If it did, we will have to include the whole House Democratic caucus into this endorsement list, because they all commended Cheney for doing the bare minimum. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 12:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People on Twitter can and do have lots of wrong beliefs. "He did endorse Cheney. People are also talking about it on twitter in reaction." — This edit summary does not imply RS. Further Special:Contribs/2600:1700:3B80:E70:5115:E243:A1D8:342B is the *only* person who thinks Crenshaw endorsed Cheney. No one else does after reading the reference. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 12:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're wondering where this garbage has come from, when this was completely unsourced too, just look here: https://twitter.com/MillerStanIL/status/1558648924969246720?t=7RUbayoqAae9kfIEOs6c7g&s=19 —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 12:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People vandalise election articles more often than you may think, just to chase clout in what we call "Election Twitter", of which I consider myself a part. Think of this edit in the Tennessee article that started a whole new movement on Twitter (twitter.com/search?q=Michael%20leone&t=ITnyxi7z4XmRXpHG6oReYQ&s=09), based on complete hoaxes. The vandalism stayed on for 5 full days until I reverted it and Drmies blocked the IP. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 12:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

' Administrator note' I can't take sides. Looks like almost consensus. The page is only protected for 24 hours. Let's await further discussion. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done as this page is no longer protected, it may be edited directly as appropriate. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Article on Harriet Hageman

since Hageman is likely going to win the primaries i think it's time to make a separate page about her MrMemer223 (talk) 21:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Being a front runner in the polls doesn't impart notability. Sure, one could create an article if Hageman was independently notable before running for election. Otherwise, one should wait until she wins general election, or the article may just be deleted. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to edit Draft:Harriet Hageman. Novemberjazz 02:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Debates

Due to the inactivity with the replies I added the debate information, but is there any reason why something in the debate section shouldn’t be there? GamingJam (talk) 23:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]