Talk:2022 North Ayrshire Council election/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Asheiou (talk · contribs) 20:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

On initial inspection, there are no glaring issues. The article seems a decent length and like it covers the relevant points.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   No issues here. I added a couple of superficial subjective commas but it's all fine.

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No issues, MoS followed without any major issues.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   No issues.

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   Citations are all from established local news outlets or the local council.

   c. (OR):

   No original research as far as I can see.

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   I can't find any copyvio or plagiarism.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   The context around the election is broad but not overly so.

   b. (focused):

   Per-ward election results are set out in a very easy-to-read way.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   This serves as an accurate account of events.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   One of the most stable edit histories I've ever seen - all edits are constructive and there are no edit wars.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   No images.

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   N/A

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

   Everything looks good!

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.