Talk:2021 Pittsburgh mayoral election

Pittsburgh Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

References date formats

Latest edit to article changed some ref dates from day-month-year TO month-day-year (with edit reason "date formats per MOS:DATEFORMAT by script, MOS:DATEUNIFY"). Before i added refs (on October 16) I checked the existing refs in article and MOST were day-month-year:

18 refs of day-month-year (refs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, and 28).
9 refs of month-day-year (refs 3, 4, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 27, and 29).
two UNdated refs (refs 22 and 24). (the horror, the horror)
one ref of year-number-number (ref 30)(in this case is yyyy-mm-dd)

Day-month-year is at top of "Acceptable date formats" at MOS:DATEFORMAT (DATEFORMAT has example: "2 September 2001") and when we MOS:DATEUNIFY, doesn't it make more sense to unify in the direction of the article's ref date majority? --EarthFurst (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]