Talk:2021 Los Angeles Chargers season
Appearance
2021 Los Angeles Chargers season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 26, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Colors used in charts
[edit]Is there a list anywhere about what the various colors used in the charts mean? There should be an explanation on this page and the similar pages for each team. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 10:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 Los Angeles Chargers season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: NSNW (talk · contribs) 13:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing your nomination soon. NSNW (talk) 13:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- [32] has no website tag. [36] links to an msn.com post that doesn't link to the original website, try to find the original source and use that instead. [195], its website tag is for the Los Angeles Chargers wikipedia page, while most other references to chargers.com in the article have been just chargers.com. Change it to be chargers.com. NSNW (talk) 14:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Now amended. For the second one, I just deleted the citation, as there was already a second citation covering the Badgley signing. Harper J. Cole (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
- There's also no source for the roster list. NSNW (talk) 18:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've now used the Week 18 gamebook to cover this. Harper J. Cole (talk) 22:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- There's also no source for the roster list. NSNW (talk) 18:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Lead:
[edit]- In that game, they were beaten by a field goal as time expired in overtime, when a tie would have put both teams in the playoffs... remove the second comma. Staley's philosophy was criticised after failed attempts in overtime defeats to the Chiefs and Raiders... change "criticised" to "criticized", same thing for "prioritised" to "prioritized". Los Angeles had prioritized an upgrade of their offensive line, with 1st-round draft pick Rashawn Slater joining free agent signings Corey Linsley and Matt Feiler... add a hyphen between "free agent". a feat previous achieved only by LaDainian Tomlinson in franchise history... "previous" needs to be changed to "previously". They struggled particularly against the run, and gave up several big plays on the ground during their season-ending defeat... remove the comma. NSNW (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, changes made now. Harper J. Cole (talk) 22:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- In that game, they were beaten by a field goal as time expired in overtime, when a tie would have put both teams in the playoffs... remove the second comma. Staley's philosophy was criticised after failed attempts in overtime defeats to the Chiefs and Raiders... change "criticised" to "criticized", same thing for "prioritised" to "prioritized". Los Angeles had prioritized an upgrade of their offensive line, with 1st-round draft pick Rashawn Slater joining free agent signings Corey Linsley and Matt Feiler... add a hyphen between "free agent". a feat previous achieved only by LaDainian Tomlinson in franchise history... "previous" needs to be changed to "previously". They struggled particularly against the run, and gave up several big plays on the ground during their season-ending defeat... remove the comma. NSNW (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Coaching changes:
[edit]- Lynn had compiled a 33–31 record over four seasons, making the playoffs once. His reign was marked by a number of narrow defeats... change "a number of" to "several". Lynn and his team were also criticised for errors with clock management... once again, change "criticised".
- Now amended.--Harper J. Cole (talk) 22:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Roster changes:
[edit]- Los Angeles overhauled their offensive line in the offseason, after the unit was perceived to have performed poorly in 2020... remove the comma. Starters Dan Feeney, Forrest Lamp, Sam Tevi and Trai Turner were either waived or allowed to leave in free agency... make it "Sam Temi, and Irai Turner". Former Steelers left guard Matt Feiler signed for three years on the same day, and Oday Aboushi, who had spent the past two seasons at Detroit, was brought in shortly afterwards to play right guard... change it to afterward instead of afterwards.
- Now amended.--Harper J. Cole (talk) 22:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Overview:
[edit]- "17th regular season game", "tied with Jonathan Taylor for the league high", "With a pair of two point conversions", "This policy played a role in several early season wins"... add hyphens between the bolded phrases. NSNW (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Now amended. Harper J. Cole (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- "17th regular season game", "tied with Jonathan Taylor for the league high", "With a pair of two point conversions", "This policy played a role in several early season wins"... add hyphens between the bolded phrases. NSNW (talk) 21:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Good. I will pass the article now. NSNW (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class National Football League articles
- Mid-importance National Football League articles
- WikiProject National Football League articles
- GA-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- GA-Class Los Angeles articles
- Low-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- GA-Class Southern California articles
- Low-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles