Talk:2021 College Football Playoff National Championship/GA1

GA Review

Passed. -- Zoo (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ZooBlazer (talk · contribs) 05:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be happy to handle this review. I'll hopefully get through the article tomorrow and post my initial thoughts then.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Overall, I think the article is in pretty good shape. There are some minor things I came across when going through the article and I did my best to organize by the sections they're in. -- Zoo (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Can you find a source for the anthem being pre-recorded so that you can replace the hidden note in the infobox?

Add halftime show info to replace hidden note if possible
- Done both PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Wikilink EST

Change dominating to defeating. It's more neutral, even if it wasn't a close game.

Maybe instead of the second efn, link to the article in the sentence and link to the specified section within the article (College football national championships in NCAA Division I FBS#Yearly national championship selections from major selectors)
- All Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:54, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Host selection

CFP organizers announced that they would move the release of final rankings --> add "the" before final

You may want to update ref #8 to this as the current ref link is for 2023
- Done both. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Imapct of Covid

I suggest maybe updating the total attendance ref to this. It both confirms the attendance listed in the article, as well as stating that the attendance was 23% of capacity which can be updated in the same section of the article which currently states the percent was approximately 20%.
- Done PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1st half

Add a space between the game summary and 1st half subsections.

Alabama started their next drive well, with a 12-yard pass --> Alabama started their next drive with a 12-yard pass

Alabama scored even more quickly on this drive --> Alabama scored even quicker on this drive

Ohio State ended their final drive of the first half --> can just say final drive of the half, since the section is about the first half
- Done all PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

I'd recommend archiving the refs. One ref is already marked as dead (#7) and needs replaced, or if there is an archive available from before the link went down, just add that.
- Ran IABot, which added 26 archives. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not absolutely necessary, but I suggest Wikilinking the sites for the refs where available. Ex: Sports Illustrated

External links

The official website link is no longer related to the game
- Changed to archive. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

@PCN02WPS: Are you going to be able to make the edits? I'd hate to have to fail this when it's so close to passing. -- Zoo (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZooBlazer I believe everything is taken care of, ready for another look. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS Everything looks good except ref #9 (formerly 7) is still dead and didn't get an archive. Fix that and I'll pass the article. -- Zoo (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZooBlazer Totally missed that one - it's been taken care of now. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PCN02WPS Everything looks good now. Passing. Congrats! -- Zoo (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.