Talk:2020 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the Membership section of this page, there would be only one sentence, and it SHOULD read "This is the sixteenth term of Chief Justice Roberts' tenure and the first term for Justice Barrett." Would you like to change it back to what I said? If so, thanks! 2601:40A:8480:1750:F875:BF38:2B6:E18E (talk) 09:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The one right says the same thing and more. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 14:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

Not done: The term began on October 5th, and at that time there was a vacant seat. I see no clear inaccuracy or other reason to change this by way of an edit request per WP:EDITXY. Changes should be supported by a consensus of editors prior to using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it's the same anonymous editor who did this back in 2018. There's a history of IP editors strangely obsessing on the language in that section.[1] postdlf (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The bizarre anonymous fixation on that section continues, reverted as not constructive and contrary to consensus above. postdlf (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What I would like to use is what I just said, because it was the same as what the membership section of the 2016 term page said. Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40A:8480:1750:3100:9F48:E4E9:4186 (talk) 00:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Schein

The case already has an article because it was decided in 2019. I think this article should link to that and there will be a section in that article about the denial or "re-cert". Jdavi333 (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, so long as it's linking to a subsection, since the article as a whole is really about the 2019 opinion. We'd then use the case-article & case-display parameters in the table. postdlf (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]