Talk:2020 College Football Playoff National Championship/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Newtothisedit (talk · contribs) 05:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
I'll pick this up for review
GA Criteria
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Comments
[edit]- "the winning team's 15–0 record equalled that of the 2018 Clemson Tigers" to "the winning team's 15–0 record would equal that of the 2018 Clemson Tigers"
- "their 29 consecutive victories following that loss constituted one of the longest NCAA Division I football winning streaks." Clarify that this is among all time win streaks. Right now it could equally be interpreted as one of the longest at the time or ever.
- I would have Clemson being the defending champs as the topic of its own sentence as its pretty important. Right now it is just brushed over in another sentence and could easily be missed.
- In the game summary link the first mention of most football terms in order to make it understandable for a more general audience. You currently have this for some terms but not all.
That's all I've got. Great job on all of your work with college sports articles. Newtothisedit (talk) 05:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Newtothisedit thank you for the review and the kind words! I believe I've covered everything, if there's anything else let me know. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Passing it Newtothisedit (talk) 22:14, 22 December 2022 (UTC)