Talk:2020 Anguillian general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Caribbean: Anguilla

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Anguilla work group (assessed as High-importance).

Endorsements

Is this section really worthwhile? Wishing someone luck (as is the extent of the endorsement for Dee-Ann Kentish-Rogers) doesn't really seem noteworthy... Number 5 7 00:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just saw it and I agree that it doesn't really seem to have its place here.--Aréat (talk) 00:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the Miss universe Dee-Ann Kentish-Rogers, who earned all these endorsements, did beat the outgoing Premier Victor Banks in his own constituency, I now think it actually could be left. Not as trivia as it seemed.--Aréat (talk) 14:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Results

@Number 57: I added results from the Supervisor of Elections Report. There's a difference between the total of votes of the seven districts (7293) and the added votes toward parties (7187) which make 106 and that I used as blank and invalid votes. The sources say there was a total of 372 spoiled ballots, though.--Aréat (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reckon the spoilt ballots may include ones in the at-large constituency. There are up to 300 'missing' voters for at-large candidates (7,293 voters could cast a total of 29,172 votes for the at-large seats and there are exactly 1,200 votes less than that, which divided by four gives 300 – of course, not all of them may have been spoilt, some may just be uncast). Cheers, Number 5 7 20:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]