Talk:2019 Tajoura migrant center airstrike

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2019 Tajoura migrant center airstrike article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving 2019 Tajoura migrant center airstrike was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 July 2019.

Wikipedia

Africa: Libya Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as Low-importance).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 July 2019 by reviewer Lovkal (talk · contribs).

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Too much detail?

With all due respect to the victims of this disaster, to me it seems that the part of the Airstrike section that graphically describes the site of the disaster contains more detail than what is appropriate for an encyclopedia. Is it really relevant to describe how the air was "filled with smoke and the smell of burnt meat"? lovkal (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Pinging @DondeEstaElBurro?: lovkal (talk) 22:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are reactions by members of the Libyan government. I feel it's important to incorporate quotes that convey a government perspective on the event. I could try using less graphic word choice, but certain details need to be included to illustrate the incident. A less graphic quote from a more relevant member of the government could well replace "burnt meat" if it detailed the incident well.

@DondeEstaElBurro?:Very well, in that case it is probably relevant. But the part just before that, "Stunned survivors awoke to widespread bloodshed and confusion within the residential unit that had been struck" is, as far as I can see, not attributed to the Libyan government and doesn't fit the encyclopedic tone in my view. Other disaster-related articles, such as September 11 attacks and Attack on Pearl Harbor do not graphically describe their events like this. lovkal (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noted.

Who was responsible?

There is not one mention in the article of who carried out the airstrike - the single sentence in the lead obliquely suggests it might have been an EU country but even that might not be correct. Thryduulf (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Was waiting to see whose resources the LNA used, since they don't have their own air force. Apparently the UAE's.

But they do. See Libyan Air Force. --SVTCobra 07:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New York Times investigation

The New York Times published an investigation about the airstrike. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Date

"air strikes on a detention centre near Libya's capital Tripoli on Tuesday"[1], "Survivors said the attack occurred about 11:30 p.m. Tuesday"[2], i.e. 2 July. --Mewaqua (talk) 04:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC) Thank you. How very interesting and somewhat infuriating. Various news agencies including the UN News site itself say 3 July but you are correct, this occurred on 2 of July near midnight. I have corrected it accordingly.[reply]