Talk:2019 Six-red World Championship
2019 Six-red World Championship has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
2019 Six-red World Championship is part of the 2019–20 snooker season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 2, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the winners of the 2019 World Cup doubles snooker event competed as opponents in the final of the 2019 Six-red World Championship? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- ... that the winners of the 2019 World Cup doubles snooker event competed as opponents in the final of the 2019 Six-red World Championship? Source: http://worldsnooker.com/six-red-king-maguire-ends-five-year-drought/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019
- Comment: In process of re-wording article and expanding, but should meet the criteria.
Created by Lee Vilenski (talk). Self-nominated at 22:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC).
- @Lee Vilenski: I'll review this one. epicgenius (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Once you do a QPQ this is ready to go. The article already satisfies length standards so you can keep expanding the article. epicgenius (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Added a QPQ which I am reviewing now: Epicgenius Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: Good to go now. I don't think it matters that you finished a review, just that you started it. I may be wrong, though, but trust that you will actually finish that QPQ. epicgenius (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think it matters too much. The reviews normally change a lot between the initial review and it being on main page anyway, I doubt this would all work if we forced every review to get to that stage for QPQ. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski, epicgenius, in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if Lee Vilenski has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. epicgenius (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- epicgenius, I think at this point, since the only thing that is missing from the QPQ is the icon and neither of you seem to have been aware that it was needed, there's no need to revoke the tick here. Lee Vilenski will surely put it in place shortly (and if they forget, the eventual promoter will likely remind them before this goes to prep). BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset, does this mean i would have to stick around to see if Lee Vilenski has done the QPQ? I don't think it makes much of a difference in either case. I just find it an inconvenience to revoke the tick only to place it again a few hours/days later. epicgenius (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski, epicgenius, in order for a QPQ to qualify, it needs to have reached the point where all the DYK criteria have been covered and a review icon given, even if that is a query or "maybe" or even "no" icon rather than one of the two ticks. If a tick isn't given, the reviewer typically sticks around to check that the requested improvements are done, but that isn't required for QPQ credit to be obtained. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think it matters too much. The reviews normally change a lot between the initial review and it being on main page anyway, I doubt this would all work if we forced every review to get to that stage for QPQ. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: Good to go now. I don't think it matters that you finished a review, just that you started it. I may be wrong, though, but trust that you will actually finish that QPQ. epicgenius (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- Added a QPQ which I am reviewing now: Epicgenius Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2019 Six-red World Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Comments
- "The 2019 SangSom Six-red World Championship.." move the sponsorship to a parenthetical "... for sponsorship reasons" sentence.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- En-dashes in scorelines.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "Thepchaiya Un-Nooh" be consistent (infobox has Thepchaiya Un-nooh, as does Maximum breaks section).
- Done I never know how these names work. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "A total of 4,000,000 Thai Baht " Baht isn't capitalised.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Other articles now seem to have format first and prize money as a subsection.
- They do... But I couldn't stretch out a worthwhile format section, so I combined into summary. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:51, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- "Third in Group" not sure Group needs capitalising.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Highest break score isn't mentioned in infobox
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "Tournament Summary" -> "Tournament summary"
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "The 2019 Six-red world championship" capitalisation consistency.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "pro-am" en-dash.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps say that 32 players were invited.
- Added to group stages Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "runner-ups" do you mean "runners-up"?
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Or avoid it altogether by saying "the top two in each group"...
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "Group A" vs "group B", consistency.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "by John Higgins 5-0.[7] Higgins" merge to avoid quick repeat.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "still "felt good".[17][16]" ref order.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- "with a round-robin group " dab link.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Group A table much wider than all the others.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure you need all that bold text in the player names...
- I don't really see how it's different from the results table. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- You don't need the country abbreviations at all in the Knockout stage table as they've all already been covered in the Group tables.
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Avoid spaced hyphens in the ref titles. En-dashes please.
- Done I think the script got them all Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Don't repeat source names in ref titles.
- Working Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
That's all for a first review, so it's on hold. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 12:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Lee, let me know when you're done? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry TRM, all done. Thought I'd already replied Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Lee, still plenty of source names in the ref titles.... The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Whoops, I only got the ones defined in the reflist. All done now. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:59, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Lee, still plenty of source names in the ref titles.... The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry TRM, all done. Thought I'd already replied Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Lee, let me know when you're done? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I made a couple of tweaks but I'm happy with the article now in terms of GA so I'm promoting, good work, onto the next one! The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 15:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics 2019–20 snooker season good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class cue sports articles
- Mid-importance cue sports articles
- All cue sports pages including snooker
- GA-Class Snooker articles
- Low-importance Snooker articles
- All snooker pages
- GA-Class Thailand articles
- Low-importance Thailand articles
- WikiProject Thailand articles