Talk:2019 Indian Premier League/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Stevie fae Scotland (talk · contribs) 15:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit]This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of March 28, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Resonably well written but not as much prose as I would expect.
- 2. Verifiable?: No immediate concerns with sources used, however the maintenance template needs to be dealt with prior to renomination, ie - properly cite Scorecards for each match result.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: No. It needs a format or process section outlining how the competition works, especially for the play-offs as the Page playoff system is unusual. Article also requires background, overview and aftermath sections outlining how the elections affected the season, how the competition went, the effect the betting controversy had and how the competition affected the proceeding World Cup as a minimum.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
You've got a good foundation to build on here but the article is short of GA criteria at the moment. The biggest problem is that there isn't enough prose about the competition.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)