Talk:2019–20 AS Monaco FC season

Football: France / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the French football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

European Microstates: Monaco

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Monaco portal This article is supported by WikiProject Monaco.

Position by round

@Dave logic: Your edit is wrong. The round number you are insisting on does not corresponds with what is seen here. It can be easily written in a note within the footballbox that the round number is not same as in the report in order to preserve chronological evolvements. You should not make any more reverts or otherwise you could be blocked.--Sakiv (talk) 12:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakiv: Match round should always match that given by the governing body of the competition. If a match is moved/postponed etc. then it should keep it's original matchday number, and using the "note" enter state the original matchday date, reason for it's movement and the new matchday date. This keeps the matches in chronological order of dates played and highlights movements in the clubs calendar. Highlighting the "sports rbr table" opens up a separate question about how that is used in conjunction with schedules that move.--Dave logic (talk) 12:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dave logic: You are contradicted. Again the result section should correspond with the result by round section. The numbering between both does not match.--Sakiv (talk) 13:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakiv: The official league source on fixture scheduling, as referenced, should be the driving factor in the numbering, not the "results by round section". I agree that that should be changed, but as it's a template then that requires a wider discussion.--Dave logic (talk) 14:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Captain

a whole article for the squad and no mention of who is the captain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.170.97.139 (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]