Talk:2019–2020 Hong Kong protests/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions about 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
List of protests to timeline?
I think the sub articals List of March–June 2019 Hong Kong protests, List of July 2019 Hong Kong protests etc should be changed to Timeline of the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests (March–June 2019), Timeline of the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests (July 2019) etc. I'd would like to know your opinions on this. — RealFakeKimT 12:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- I am sympathetic with this move, with my only (perhaps unfounded) concern being that the longer title may be less convenient to read on mobile devices. In any case, and in some relation to this issue, I would like to propose that the links to two of those sub-articles be changed from "March–June" to "March–June 2019" and from "January" to "January 2020", respectively, in order to resolve the current ambiguity with the year that is meant. --CRau080 (talk) 22:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- CRau080 thats a tecnical issue so we souldn't be consurned about it. — RealFakeKimT 10:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- RealFakeKimT I am happy to accept the potential issue that I raised as technical and irrelevant. And I think a strong reason for changing the articles names in the way you suggested is that it gives a stronger sense of completeness (or at least an attempt at it) than the "List of ..." formulation. --CRau080 (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- I 100% agree I'll leave it for the normall 7 days of a move request to see what others think. — RealFakeKimT 12:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- RealFakeKimT I am happy to accept the potential issue that I raised as technical and irrelevant. And I think a strong reason for changing the articles names in the way you suggested is that it gives a stronger sense of completeness (or at least an attempt at it) than the "List of ..." formulation. --CRau080 (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Seems better, we dont do lists at wikipedia. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @RealFakeKim: Please stop bold move and use proper WP:RM process. I.e. tag those articles with the template. Matthew hk (talk) 10:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Most sources from major companys, as a rule of thumb most are heavily intertwined with chinese government, Tianamen square protests are good example, now takes roughly two hours to find real number dead in a western country, est 2000, not fully accuarate as flamethrowers were used. Chinese morning post is DIRECTLY sponsored by chinese government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:E40A:EC00:D9A2:87B0:C238:EEF4 (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Discussion on sub article
See Talk:List_of_early_2019_Hong_Kong_protests#Requested_move_11_March_2020 for a move request of the artical. — RealFakeKimT 19:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)