Talk:2018 Nobel Peace Prize/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BlackfullaLinguist (talk · contribs) 13:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Excellent article! As it's been almost a year, is there anything else that could be added? I notice there is an 'early reactions' section, are there any 'later reactions' to mention? Any dissent or controversy to mention? If there is nothing new to add, then I think it's good to go! BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for this update! I'll check for additional notable reactions. Meanwhile, I've changed the section title "Early reactions" to "Reactions", moved the nominations paragraph into the "Nobel Committee" section, and reordered the "Nobel Committee" section to last. I could add in the "Laureates' work" section something about the current status of international law on conflict-related sexual violence, since "historic context" was mentioned in the lead section, but that might go beyond the scope of the article. I'd appreciate any advice you might offer. —Litjade (talk) 00:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think you've covered it all, I did some googling to see if there was anything else, but I've come up with nothing. My final note, would be just to go through and blue-link any terms that might need explaining / have their own article - I just linked the 'sexual violence in war...' to the 'Wartime Sexual Violence' article. I can see the article is pretty well linked anywhere, so I'm not sure if there is even anymore, but perhaps read the Style Guide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking and if you don't think it needs any more links, then I can't see any reason not to pass it. I know it's low on images..but what kind of public images can one expect of two living people? Perhaps just do a quick search and make sure there is nothing useful, again though, I doubt there will be. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 09:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Congratulations @Litjade:! Your article has passed the review! I consider 2018 Nobel Peace Prize to have met all 6 criteria, it is well-written, concise and well linked, verifiable, broad in coverage yet on topic, neutral in it's viewpoint, stable in its content, and sufficiently illustrated. This review has been finalised. Once again, congratulations on your work and thank you for contributing. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- As a side note, bringing the article up to FA standard I would look at that current status in international law idea /but/ only so far as it applies to these two people. Are they part of a larger movement the international community has taken note of? Did this award afford them any publicly recorded opportunities to speak or present on the topic? Have they gained anything that we can tie directly to their award winning? Again, all those points are beyond 'Good Article' and move into 'A' and 'Featured Article' criteria, so not pertinent for GA I think, but still something to think about for any user wishing to progress this article further. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Congratulations @Litjade:! Your article has passed the review! I consider 2018 Nobel Peace Prize to have met all 6 criteria, it is well-written, concise and well linked, verifiable, broad in coverage yet on topic, neutral in it's viewpoint, stable in its content, and sufficiently illustrated. This review has been finalised. Once again, congratulations on your work and thank you for contributing. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- I think you've covered it all, I did some googling to see if there was anything else, but I've come up with nothing. My final note, would be just to go through and blue-link any terms that might need explaining / have their own article - I just linked the 'sexual violence in war...' to the 'Wartime Sexual Violence' article. I can see the article is pretty well linked anywhere, so I'm not sure if there is even anymore, but perhaps read the Style Guide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking and if you don't think it needs any more links, then I can't see any reason not to pass it. I know it's low on images..but what kind of public images can one expect of two living people? Perhaps just do a quick search and make sure there is nothing useful, again though, I doubt there will be. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 09:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)