Talk:2018 Leeds City Council election
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Percentage vote share
[edit]Thanks to the people who did the hard work on this page! I'm just trying to understand how the vote share has been calculated here:
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Elizabeth Nash* | 2,399 | 47.4 | N/A | |
Labour | Mohammed Iqbal* | 2,391 | |||
Labour | Paul Wray | 2,132 | |||
Green | Ed Carlisle | 1,740 | 34.4 | ||
Green | Eunice Goncalves | 1,024 | |||
Green | Alaric Hall | 931 | |||
Conservative | Richard Salt | 409 | 8.1 | ||
Conservative | Scott Smith | 384 | |||
Conservative | Michael Wheeler | 342 | |||
Independent | Kenny Saunders | 340 | 6.7 | ||
Liberal Democrats | James Spencer | 176 | 3.5 | ||
Majority | 659 | 13.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 16,702 | 27.4 | N/A | ||
Labour win (new seat) | |||||
Labour win (new seat) | |||||
Labour win (new seat) |
The total number of votes cast here is 12268. The total number of votes cast for Labour is 6922. That's a lot more than 47.4%: it's 56.4%. Is there a miscalculation here, or am I misunderstanding the method of calculation? Thanks! Alarichall (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- @LeedsOwl: looks like you did the calculations here? Alarichall (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I get it now: you've counted only the top scorers for each party. I'll add a note to this effect. Is this a standard methodology for elections like this? It seems a bit odd to me. Alarichall (talk) 06:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is odd but trying to continue same format as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_City_Council_election,_2004. User:LeedsOwl (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Turnout vs electorate
[edit]It appears that in each table (though I've only checked two so far) the figure given as 'turnout' is actually the size of the electorate. I'll fix it when i get a moment, if nobody else does first, but I thought I'd mention it here in the meantime! Alarichall (talk) 21:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I now see it's a problem with the template. Presumably it's a standardised format? Does anyone know how one goes about making a template clearer? Alarichall (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)