Talk:2017 Vegas eRace/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This one looks very solid. JAGUAR 19:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The total prize fund was $1 million (the largest in eSports racing history as of 2017)" - this sounds like a worthy mention for the lead
- Suggestion noted; fact now in the lead. MWright96 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"and utilized virtual identical cars" - wrong order: and utilized identical virtual cars (otherwise it sounds like virtually identical cars)
- Done MWright96 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Since no G-forces could be felt by drivers during the race, Cloud Sport got around this by programming the vehicles to respond to the inertia created by sudden acceleration and this made for a realistic driving experience: vehicles tilted onto three wheels during sharp cornering, and their performance deteriorated if the cars sustained damage" - this could be split into two sentences
- Done MWright96 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
", then maybe they are pretty good!" Hans-Jürgen Abt" - missing full stop
- Done MWright96 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No dead links
Ref 12 has an extra space in it (I think)? Something is awry with the fomatting
- The copy-editor had the same issue with formatting and something I could do apart from remove part of the title. MWright96 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article! It is well written, comprehensive and very engaging. I would recommend submitting this for FAC in the future as it stands a very good chance. I'll place this on hold until those minor nitpicks are clarified. JAGUAR 14:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- @Jaguar: That's all of the points addressed above. MWright96 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Brilliant work as always. Let's promote this.

JAGUAR 19:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]