Jump to content

Talk:2017 Pakistan Super League/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: A.A Prinon (talk · contribs) 13:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Review coming soon.  A.A Prinon  Conversation 13:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Introduction of article

[edit]
  • "On 19 October 2016, at the 2017 player draft, league chairman Najam Sethi announced that the final of the 2017 tournament might be played in Lahore, Pakistan, depending on the security situation there." - what's the source?
  • "The 2017 PSL was broadcast in more than 10 territories." - source?
  • "The 2017 PSL was broadcast in more than 10 territories"=> "The 2017 PSL was broadcasted in more than 10 territories."
  • "The tournament also witnessed a spot-fixing controversy which was resolved on 30 August 2017." - source?

More to come.  A.A Prinon  Conversation 14:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @A.A Prinon: Thanks for reviewing this, as per MOS:CITELEAD if the sources are in the appropriate section then they don’t need to be sourced for the lead. On the final being played in Lahore have a look at the background section. CreativeNorth (talk) 15:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A.A Prinon: I’ve now fixed the sentence on broadcasting. CreativeNorth (talk) 06:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further comments

[edit]

@CreativeNorth: I can't find any more issues except the previous ones. I think article meets all the criteria as its board in its coverage, reliably sourced and stable. Earlier, a user left a message on article's talk page saying that it needed more sources in Format section. But now I am seeing that fixed with reliable sources. So, I can pass it and list in good article. 09:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]