Jump to content

Talk:2017 New York City ePrix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2017 New York City ePrix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2017 New York City ePrix is part of the 2016-17 Formula E season race reports series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 2, 2018Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 1, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 2017, the Brooklyn Street Circuit hosted the New York City ePrix, the city's first automobile race since 1896?
Current status: Good article

New York City ePrix?

[edit]

Formula E calls the ePrix "New York City ePrix" [1]. Should we move the article accordingly? Wild8oar (talk) 06:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, @MWright96:! Since you are the main contributor, I will go ahead and move the articles.Wild8oar (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2017 New York City ePrix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 20:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take a look at this one, will post review soon. Kosack (talk) 20:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Preparations

[edit]

Race One

[edit]

Practice and qualifying

[edit]

Race

[edit]

Race two

[edit]

Practice and qualifying

[edit]

Race

[edit]
[edit]
  • Is this race set to be repeated? Otherwise the bottom navbox seems a bit unnecessary if there is no other race before or after.

An extremely detailed and well written article. Very minor points to address. On hold for now. Kosack (talk) 18:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No further concerns, promoting. Kosack (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]