Jump to content

Talk:2017 NHL expansion draft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protected list

[edit]

Is it necessary to have that huge chart of the protected list in here? Doesn't appear to be the norm for past expansion draft articles, and maybe a citation that links to a published article is sufficient? Ultimately I would think that list of who IS drafted, and not who can't be, would be most important after results are announced. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I kind of agree. Frankly, it should be unprotected players that are shown because they are eligible. LordAtlas (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, the results of the expansion draft should be the focal point of this article, not the protection lists for the other NHL teams. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive69#2017 NHL Expansion Draft--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 21:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1991 NHL Dispersal and Expansion Drafts which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]