Talk:2017 Mexico–United States diplomatic crisis

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations

United States

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Mexico

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico

Don't merge

This article should not be merged into Mexico–United States relations. This article is about something recent and specific, as opposed to Mexico–United States relations in general. Also, the 2017 Mexico–United States diplomatic crisis is a significant enuf topic to warrant a separate article.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 19:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Crisis"

Overdramatic, no? Are there any reliable sources describing a "crisis" happening? Marquis de Faux (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the grammar in the article so awful?

"The Mexican government stated they will not under any circumstances accept"

Who wrote this? This is some of the worst articles I've ever read!--Adûnâi (talk) 06:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't seem necessary, yet

It's unclear how the NAFTA renegotiation is/would going (Mexico themselves could benefit, if Trump imposes stronger restrictions on Chinese auto parts in the NA auto market) and won't be known until it's made public next year. The article itself dead-ends in February of this year, without any updates.

NAFTA renegotiation is an extremely fickle issue, and this article does a poor attempt at tackling it. Either have someone familiar with NAFTA rewrite it to a higher standard or delete it.

-- user: anonymous 4:26, December 28, 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.189.217.205 (talk)