Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Some things left to do here:

At the end of the first paragraph, you need to make it clearer that Kwiatkowski is comparing himself a year before with Sagan when saying that it is "very difficult" with the pressure of the rainbow jersey.
You also need to make the expression "without legs" clearer. Maybe don't use the quote at all and rather paraphrase it.
Also, you use the word "said" too often in that section. Try to find some synonyms to make it a more enjoyable read.
The article could also use another photo, maybe one in the favorites section, or one of the eventual winner in the race summary or post-race section.

Sorry this took so long. I should be through all four reviews by tomorrow. On hold for now. Good job so far! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the nominator does not appear to be coming back, I have made the changes myself. Passed for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]