Talk:2016 Amstel Gold Race/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

I will review this as part of the GAN Backlog Drive. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another very good article. Since the nominator seems inactive, I made all necessary changes myself and will promote it to GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)