Jump to content

Talk:2015 Vuelta a España/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Glad to review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

An exquisitly written article on this year's Vuelta. I made several minor changes myself which leaves only minor things to do:

  • The the last paragraph of the lead, I feel the wording should be slightly changed. At the moment it sounds like Valverde won the classification on the last stage alone. Maybe better: was decided during?
  • Pre-race favorites: last paragraphs: I feel it is quite the generalized statement to assume that all sprinters were preparing for the WC.
  • Caption for the stage 11 photo: It might have been the most difficult stage, but that is not an objective statement.
  • Any chance for a source on the mountain points?

That's about it. Great work! I put it on hold for now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Zwerg Nase. How does that look? Relentlessly (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! Another one off the list :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]