Talk:2015 United States elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Discussion

- "This is an on-year election, in which the President will be elected for 2016." This sentence does not make sense to me. Sparr (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The POV for the introduction is not neutral. It completely omits the Democrats' wins in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Louisiana. Myownworst (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page move by User:GoodDay

@GoodDay: Hi, I undid your page move because I was unsure why it was done. All U.S. elections pages are formatted in this way: United States elections, year. Is there an explanation for the move? Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 22:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An RFC was held & closed with the result being to move all Country election, Year article titles to Year country election. I just didn't link to the Rfc (which I should've) @Number 57:, can fill ya in. GoodDay (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the RfC resulted in WP:NC-GAL being amended to put the year first. There is meant to be a bot run happening to move all the articles soon, but it's not a problem for people to move them ahead of time (the bot will simply ignore any article that has already been moved). Cheers, Number 5 7 22:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Alright -- I see you've done this with most elections articles in the US (2014, 2016, 2017, etc.) so I'll let you move this page back to how you did it. Sorry for the undo. A bot will apparently be moving in to do all these page moves automatically so no worries then. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 22:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: Sounds good. Just looked at that RFC. I support it, too, but I just wanted to double check to make sure the page move wasn't out of MOS. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 22:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]