Talk:2015 Tour of Qatar

2015 Tour of Qatar has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 7, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Qatar Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Qatar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Qatar-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.QatarWikipedia:WikiProject QatarTemplate:WikiProject QatarQatar articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Tour of Qatar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 09:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, very sorry about the long delay. But now let's get to it:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Overall, this is a very good and detailed article. I made two minor changes myself. There are just some very minor points that caused me to put this on hold, which are:

Second paragraph: "The 2015 race consisted of six stages". How does that compare to previous editions? Did it change?
Stage 6: First you say there are six laps on the circuit but two paragraphs later you state the intermediate sprints are after laps 4 and 7. That does not add up.
The photos do not appear to be from the race the article is about. The captions should state when the pictures were taken.
How many riders entered the race (also how many to each team)? And how many finished the race?

You should be able to clear those out in just a few minutes and this article will get my GA-approval in no time :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Zwerg Nase for what was clearly very careful reading of the article and four very good points. I've addressed all these issues. I have a slight question about how I've added the dates to the photographs – is that what you meant? Relentlessly (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I would recommend following the example set here: 1985 Giro d'Italia. If naming the contest were the picture was taken makes the caption too long, then I guess just writing "(pictured here in 2013)" would be fine as well. Apart from that, everything seems to be in order. Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Zwerg Nase. I've used your second option, as there isn't much information on some of the images. Relentlessly (talk) 08:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And there we go! Congrats! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]