Talk:2015 Tour of Oman/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

There was one dead link, which I fixed myself.

As usual, I would ask you to add a word into the caption of the photos about when they were taken, since they are not from the event itself.
In the last paragraph, the notion "one of the great cyclists of the twentieth century" about Merckx does not sound very neutral. At the very least, you should give a source of someone who calls him that.
I see that there are no final result tables, espacially considering the other classifications. Where you unable to find those results?

Generally, another very good article about a 2015 cycling race that is just minor steps away from that little green plus. :) Cheers, Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, Zwerg Nase. I've made some changes – have they dealt with your concerns? Relentlessly (talk) 14:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I might a slight change at the end myself, I now consider everything taken care of and will give it a pass. Congratulations and thank you for your continuing work on cycling articles! Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]