Talk:2015 Russian submarine wreck discovery

A fact from 2015 Russian submarine wreck discovery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the submarine wreck found off the Swedish east coast in July 2015 was most likely the Russian Som that sank in 1916?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2015 Swedish submarine wreck discovery.

Wikipedia

Military history: Maritime / European / Nordic / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bold in article

Well Lappspira, every article should have a word or words in the lead in bold to define the article. If the word combo that you just removed is not satisfactory, what do you suggest we use instead? And which part of the WP:MOS do you base the removal of the bold on? Cheers, w.carter-Talk 09:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Im just complying with Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section#Format_of_the_first_sentence where it says:

1 "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the opening sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it :[in the lead]"

2 "Instead, simply describe the subject in normal English, avoiding redundancy"

3 "In general, if the article's title is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear*

—Lappspira (talk) 09:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Ok, then. Thanks for the quick answer. (I really should learn to scroll before asking.) w.carter-Talk 09:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]