Talk:2015 Russian Grand Prix
Appearance
2015 Russian Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
2015 Russian Grand Prix is part of the 2015 Formula One season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Russian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Z105space (talk · contribs) 19:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I shall review this article. Comments will appear soon. Z105space (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
General
[edit]- Lewis Hamilton, Max Verstappen, Nico Hülkenberg and Marcus Ericsson are wikilinked more than once in the article.
- Done
- For Carlos Sainz Jr, the word Jr. is not required after the first instance as there is no need to disambiguate.
- Done
Infobox
[edit]- "Sochi Autodrom, Adlersky City District, Sochi, Krasnodar Krai, Russia" - Overlink is present here. Consider delinking Russia.
- Done
Lead
[edit]- "The race, contested over fifty-three laps," - The fifty-three lap race.
- Done
Background
[edit]- "with drivers able to drive fast lap times all through the race on a one-stop strategy." - record?
- Done
- "in accordance with Rossi's five-race contract that sees him sit out this race and Abu Dhabi." - Reword to the past tense and I believe it would be better if Abu Dhabi should be spelt as the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix.
- Done
Free practice
[edit]- "two 1.5-hour sessions on Friday" - 1.5 hour should be replaced by 90-minute.
- Done
- "all three session" - typo in the word session.
- Done
Qualifying
[edit]- "Manor Marussias" - This should be either Manor Marussia cars or drivers.
- Done
- "Force Indias" - ditto.
- Done
Race
[edit]- "while Hamilton was extending his lead over second placed Bottas." - Should be "while Hamilton extended his lead over Bottas".
- Past-progressive form should be correct here since it describes actions "going on at a certain time in the past", which is the case here. While Hamilton extends his lead, Maldonado moves ahead of Button.
- I see the point raised.
- Past-progressive form should be correct here since it describes actions "going on at a certain time in the past", which is the case here. While Hamilton extends his lead, Maldonado moves ahead of Button.
- "retaining his lead without incidents." - incident.
- Done
- DRS should be spelt out with the acronym in brackets.
- Done
Post-race
[edit]- "Speaking about his accident in the race," - It should be "After his accident on lap 12,"
- I do not quite understand why one is better than the other?
- The sentence has repetition of the word "spoke" and its other form "speaking" twice, and it would be better to be worded as "After his accident on lap 12". Feel free to disagree with my view.
- I do not quite understand why one is better than the other?
References
[edit]- No dead links.
That's all I could find. On hold until the above issues have been rectified. Z105space (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Z105space: Thank you for another review! Two issues above are still up for debate, but shouldn't be too hard to get out of the way :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Z105space: Sorry, completely overlooked the speak/spoke thing. Good call! Fixed now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Zwerg Nase: I can now pass this article's nomination. Z105space (talk) 12:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Z105space: Sorry, completely overlooked the speak/spoke thing. Good call! Fixed now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics 2015 Formula One season good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class Formula One articles
- Mid-importance Formula One articles
- GA-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance GA-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles