Jump to content

Talk:2015 Pro Bowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reason for rule changes

[edit]

So there seem to have been made a series of arbitrary rule changes. What's the reasoning behind it? Adding two minute warnings probably aims at making the game more exciting but narrowing down the distance between the goal posts and so on? Can someone enlighten the reader? -- TZorn (talk) 03:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The narrowed goal posts and video replay (not sure if it was used) were basically a trial of possible changes that have been suggested and will be evaluated and voted on by the rules committee (or owners) in the years to come. Dabullzrule (talk) 04:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015 Pro Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]