Talk:2015 People's Republic of China military reform

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

PLA

Second para: " ... Chinese senior military officers said that the PLA was planning to reduce the number of military regions ... " If "PLA" means "People's Liberation Army", perhaps the sentence should be changed to " ... Chinese senior military officers said that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) was planning to reduce the number of military regions ... ", so that the acronym will be meaningful in the second-last para. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Major Improvements Required

This article is horribly written/translated, with numerous copy edit and reference issues, from anonymous "sources" to unclear quotations and dates.

I did what little I could to make it somewhat coherent.

In need of an expert for a complete rewrite, ideally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:8280:58F0:D446:72D0:7899:86FA (talk) 07:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor

Dave mark@gmail2022.com 105.112.41.210 (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]