Talk:2015 Pan American Games/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 19:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "such as the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, United Kingdom" - no need, I'm sure everyone knows where London is
- "the closing ceremony of the 2011 Pan American Games in Guadalajara, Mexico" - remove 'Mexico' here as this is a repetition
- Ref 45 has an external link in the publisher field
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This article's attention to detail is impressive, and I could see no reason to put this on hold due to the lack of prose issues found. I've read through it twice and checked all of the sources I could access, but I couldn't find any problems with it. Therefore it meets the criteria, good work! JAGUAR 17:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- I removed "United Kingdom" from the sentence that mentions London. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)