Jump to content

Talk:2015 Newfoundland and Labrador general election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

49th election?

[edit]

Shouldn't this be the 48th election? Or was there an election that never resulted in an assembly? Ds77 (talk) 03:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was, the 2nd, see also User:117Avenue/Atlantic Canada elections. 117Avenue (talk) 04:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New ridings

[edit]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but won't this election be using the new boundaries that were announced yesterday? Looks like we're going to have to start from scratch with the tables. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the new ridings will be used: See here -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my sandbox I started the process of changing all the names. I'm wondering what to do about the incumbent column seeing some of the seats have had such big changes. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can try and calculate the predecessor and successor ridings. -- Earl Andrew - talk 20:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wondered if it'd just be left out seeing it could get rather confusing. However, the Ontario general election, 1999 shows how it can be done. Once I get the new names corrected in the chart you can go ahead and try and figure out incumbents if you like. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 15:33, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I updated the charts with the new names here. I decided to change the charts a bit so that the categories are St. John's, St. John's suburbs, Avalon Peninsula, Eastern Newfoundland, Central Newfoundland and Western Newfoundland. Previously parts of what people would consider Eastern Newfoundland were under central and the Burin Peninsula was grouped with the Avalon. I'm not sure if anyone would have any objections to how I've divided them up. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 16:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are still some issues with regards to who the incumbents are in certain districts. For instance the district of Mount Scio takes in parts of three former districts. As does the district of Virginia Water-Pleaseantville which seems to take in almost equal parts of the former districts of St. John's East, Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi and Virginia Waters. There are a number of examples of this so I'm wondering how to proceed? Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 23:06, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did some number crunching to figure out which riding's are the primary successor and predecessor ridings, which I used to update the tables. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then. Some of the district names need to be updated - which I can do - and I'm wondering if there's any opposition to rearranging the categories that the districts are divided up into, as I mentioned above. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You can re-organize them if you want, but my question is "why"? We will also have to do something in regards to the Waterford Valley riding which shared no territory with the previous riding called Waterford Valley (which became Mt Pearl North). I noticed there is a redirect at Waterford Valley (electoral district) but no article at Waterford Valley. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My issue with the way they're organized now is that they don't really reflect where they are located. For instance, the Central Newfoundland category has districts that many consider to be in Eastern Newfoundland. I don't really like how Western/Southern are together, especially seeing some of those districts are on the northern peninsula. As for Waterford Valley, we could call the former district Waterford Valley (former district)? Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't object to any re-ogranization, as long as each region has between 4 and 12 ridings in it (my personal preference). My suggestion for Waterford Valley is to just have all instances of the previous riding re-direct to Mount Pearl North, and have a note on both pages about the other district with the same name. (This is how I handled the Rideau Ward situation in Ottawa). There seems to be no precedent on Wikipedia, as we have ridings like York Centre (provincial electoral district) where the info about both iterations are on the same page despite not sharing any territory, while Saint John Harbour (electoral district) has a different article than Saint John Harbour (1974-1995), despite the riding sharing some territory. -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the overlay map of St. John's East-Quidi Vidi it seems pretty clear that the district takes in significant portions of both St. John's East and Signal Hill-Quidi Vidi. In an interview Lorraine Michael also pointed out that half the polls from her district were put into SJEQV and half went to Virginia Waters - Pleaseantville. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 02:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that one more poll (15-14) is being transferred to Virginia Waters-Pleasantville than St John's East-Quidi Vidi, making the former the successor riding. You can count yourself here: http://election-atlas.ca/nl/ -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks for showing me that site, it's amazing. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 13:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates

[edit]

People have been adding candidates who are seeking nominations - I've done some myself - but there seems to be many getting added now who I've seen nothing in the news or on social media about. Seems as though rumoured candidates are being added and this obviously isn't the place for it. I would prefer to only having candidates who have been officially nominated to run, rather than everyone who announces they may seek a nomination. As of right now there are about 11 candidates who have won their nominations, all Liberals. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 13:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think precedent has indicated it is acceptable to list anyone who has announced they are running. However, if it is unsourced, then I would agree with removing the candidates. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look at providing sources for some of the names there and delete others that I can't get sources for. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Newfoundland and Labrador general election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2015_Newfoundland_and_Labrador_general_election&oldid=1196690459"