Talk:2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

On it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some minor things:

• Background: In the first sentence, I think established would be a better term.

Oh, that's it. Made some more minor changes myself.

Good edits, thanks. I've moved the images back up a bit, though, because they were dropping down into the section below on very wide screens. I've also made all the many changes listed above! Thanks as ever, ZN. Relentlessly (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Good job, as always! Pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)