Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Again, here just minor things:

• As with the Amstel Gold Race, you should move the citations out of the lead.
• Pre-race favourites: You should give Kwiatkowskis team.
• Final loops around Huy: You take the information that Gilbert looked sore from the source. I would say, that that is too much POV on the author's part and should probably taken out.
• Race finale: Same goes for the assertion that the break didn't have a chance at 12 km to go. That is mere speculation on the author's part and should not go into the article. I'm sure you can phrase it more neutral.
• Same as with Amstel Gold race, you should add a row with a source at the bottom of the UCI standings table.

That's about it :) Seven days on hold, I'm sure we'll be done a lot earlier! Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Zwerg Nase. All done, I think. Relentlessly (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)