Talk:2015 Clásica de San Sebastián/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 09:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The following things need to be adressed:

Teams: The statement that all World Tour teams are obligated to attend needs a source.
Favourites: The two examples of Valverde's earlier wins need sources as well.

All in all, this is a short, but comprehensive report on the race with very minor flaws. Once these are adressed, it will get a pass. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zwerg Nase thanks for your review. Will sort this when I'm back from holiday. But does reference 7 not cover Valverde? Thanks. Relentlessly (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Relentlessly: You're right, it's there, I had only read the parts in the source on Rodriguez, since the footnote is behind the statements on him. You could add two more sources on the two seperate races to make it very good though ;) Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zwerg Nase done now, I think? Relentlessly (talk) 07:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think so too. Congrats! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]