This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
@Jdforrester: Regarding your edit summary "Tart this up a bit to be a bit more like our normal lists", I note that your edits have reintroduced a lot of capitalisation of words that are not proper nouns in violation of MOS:CAPS. You've also introduced links in the section headings, and that is specifically discouraged in WP:LINKSTYLE, where it says: "Section headings should not themselves contain links"
I thus wonder whether it is the other 'normal lists' that need tarting up, as both these departures from the Manual of Style are common with honours lists. I'd be grateful for your thoughts. Schwede6601:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Schwede66: You're more than welcome to start the ball rolling on following the wider standards more generally to these pages; I gave up long ago arguing over it, and just abide by the consensus reached. James F.(talk)02:36, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I find it rather interesting that other editors are arguing for a departure from the Manual of Style. Is there anybody watching this page who would argue that WP:LINKSTYLE and MOS:CAPS shall not apply? Schwede6602:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than expect people to be watching this talk page like a hawk, you should probably start a conversation on the wikiprojects. James F.(talk)02:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]