Talk:2015 Bahrain GP2 Series round/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   " while Lazarus and Rapax rounded out the top five" Lazarus is already linked in the lead

    Done MWright96 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

   "The first race was held over either 170 kilometres (110 mi)" - why is metric first?

   It is the standard for the GP2 races to place kilometres first just like in Formula One. MWright96 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Take my advice and nominate this for FA as soon as you can! JAGUAR  20:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Haha, tempting but not quite yet. Needs a little more expansion work before FA can be realistic. ;) MWright96 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)