Talk:2015 AFC Asian Cup qualification

Seeding / draw date

Published by Kuwait FA.

http://www.football-rankings.info/2012/04/kuwait-fa-publish-2015-asian-cup.html Edgar (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scenarios - 19 November

These are far from accurate. There's lots of other elimination scenarios - most based on if Lebanon and Kuwait win, in which case any team would need at least 8 points to be the best third ranked team, so teams like Yemen and Indoensia would be eliminated regardless of their results. There are also additional cases for a number of other teams (for example, Iraq would then definitely be out with a loss). Similarly if Lebanon win and Kuwait draw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.200.150.88 (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You are right that the scenarios published do not address the issue of whether the teams who can finish 3rd have or have not kept chances to qualify. But this is not the same as to say that they are inaccurate. Please make the calculations needed and supplement the article with the outcome. Ivan Volodin (talk) 14:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2015 AFC Asian Cup qualification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]